https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Index ${session.getAttribute("locale")} 5 https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:29071 Supporting Policy In health with Research: an Intervention Trial (SPIRIT). Mixed methods data was triangulated to identify, critique and revise how the intervention's essential elements should be articulated and scored. Results: Over 50 provisional elements were refined to a final list of 20 and the scoring rationalised. Six (often overlapping) challenges to the validity of the essential elements were identified. They were (1) redundant-the element was not essential; (2) poorly articulated-unclear, too specific or not specific enough; (3) infeasible-it was not possible to implement the essential element as intended; (4) ineffective-the element did not effectively deliver the change principles; (5) paradoxical-counteracting vital goals or change principles; or (6) absent or suboptimal-additional or more effective ways of operationalising the theory were identified. We also identified potentially valuable 'prohibited' elements that could be used to help reduce threats to validity. Conclusions: We devised a method for critiquing the construct validity of our intervention's essential elements and modifying how they were articulated and measured, while simultaneously using them as fidelity indicators. This process could be used or adapted for other contextualised interventions, taking evaluators closer to making theoretically and contextually sensitive decisions upon which to base fidelity assessments.]]> Wed 11 Apr 2018 14:55:08 AEST ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:45232 Thu 27 Oct 2022 12:58:14 AEDT ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:31931 Thu 14 Apr 2022 10:58:46 AEST ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:32809 Mon 23 Sep 2019 13:39:40 AEST ]]>